Re: New API for non cache coherent ppc cpu's
From: Dan Malek <hidden>
Date: 2001-11-22 23:07:12
Paul Mackerras wrote:
If we have to have a consistent_sync_page, it should be purely a local function in our implementation of the official DMA mapping API - see Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt.
That's exactly what it is. We are not creating a new API, and it shouldn't have been described as such.
.... Drivers should be using functions such as pci_alloc_consistent, pci_map_single, pci_dma_sync_single, pci_unmap_single, etc. The implementation of those routines should do the correct cache flushing - if it doesn't then we need to fix it.
They do. Recently a pci_sync_page was added for some reason (because Linux doesn't have a real VM implementation I guess :-). We just needed to add the underlying function to support it. I think it popped up in one of the SCSI drivers.
If you're talking about non-PCI devices, use the pci DMA API but just pass NULL for the dev (we need to make sure that will work ok on the non-cache-coherent cpus).
Ummm....I don't normally do this because using these functions requires the CONFIG_PCI option, which isn't supported or has bad effects when requested on processors that don't have PCI. For non-PCI devices, I call the consistent_* functions, which other architectures support and do as well. So, we kind of have a common interface here for non-PCI devices as well. I stole all of this cache coherency stuff from ARM and Sparc (or MIPS, I don't remember) when I did it the first time. Thanks. -- Dan ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/