Re: Linux/PPC BitKeeper tree announcements

Franz Sirl wrote:

At 02:50 2001-01-19, iweiny@pacbell.net wrote:

quoted

At the risk of sounding stupid I guess I need a newer compiler than egcs for
the new kernel trees?

fork.c:353: fixed or forbidden register 68 (0) was spilled for class CR0_REGS.
This may be due to a compiler bug or to impossible asm
statements or clauses.

You shouldn't be using _anything_ older than gcc-2.95.2 on PPC anymore. In
the meantime the release of gcc-2.95.3 is pending and I would _strongly_
recommend you to use it.

Why do you so strongly recommend using it?

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/