Re: Linux/PPC BitKeeper tree announcements
From: Franz Sirl <hidden>
Date: 2001-01-19 11:40:45
At 02:50 2001-01-19, iweiny@pacbell.net wrote:
At the risk of sounding stupid I guess I need a newer compiler than egcs for the new kernel trees? fork.c:353: fixed or forbidden register 68 (0) was spilled for class CR0_REGS. This may be due to a compiler bug or to impossible asm statements or clauses.
You shouldn't be using _anything_ older than gcc-2.95.2 on PPC anymore. In the meantime the release of gcc-2.95.3 is pending and I would _strongly_ recommend you to use it. You can find the latest RPM's on <ftp://devel.linuxppc.org/users/fsirl/glibc-2.1/>, the current revision is 2t, which corresponds to gcc-2.95.3.test2. Minimum download are the cpp and gcc packages, for C++ you need gcc-c++ and libstdc++ packages as well. Franz. ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/