Re: xf 4.0.0/1 with rage II/rage pro -- should the ati driver work?

On Sun, 24 Sep 2000, Michael Schmitz wrote:

quoted

 > 	/* hack */
 > 	pScrn->videoRam = 2048;
 > [...]
 > The hack to unconditionally set pScrn->videoRam to 2M should be removed,


The rsync of atimach64ppc.c I got earlier today doesn't have this
unconditonal assignment hack anymore.  The hardwired vram setting

It was too obvious to go undetected for long :-). Now if the kernel
framebuffer driver (atyfb, and don't check the 'no video driver' option
when using BootX) reportds the correct vram size the X server should see
the correct size as well.

However, I see a problem. Atyfb reports the video RAM size minus the cursor
area. If you divide that number of bytes by 1024 to get pScrn->videoRam, you
end up with 1 MB too few :-(

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/