Re: xf 4.0.0/1 with rage II/rage pro -- should the ati driver work?
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2000-09-24 13:42:44
On Sun, 24 Sep 2000, Michael Schmitz wrote:
quoted
> /* hack */ > pScrn->videoRam = 2048; > [...] > The hack to unconditionally set pScrn->videoRam to 2M should be removed, The rsync of atimach64ppc.c I got earlier today doesn't have this unconditonal assignment hack anymore. The hardwired vram settingIt was too obvious to go undetected for long :-). Now if the kernel framebuffer driver (atyfb, and don't check the 'no video driver' option when using BootX) reportds the correct vram size the X server should see the correct size as well.
However, I see a problem. Atyfb reports the video RAM size minus the cursor
area. If you divide that number of bytes by 1024 to get pScrn->videoRam, you
end up with 1 MB too few :-(
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/