Re: xf 4.0.0/1 with rage II/rage pro -- should the ati driver work?
From: R Shapiro <hidden>
Date: 2000-09-23 22:19:22
From: R Shapiro <hidden>
Date: 2000-09-23 22:19:22
Michael Schmitz writes: > That might be due to a bug in the ati driver (last time I rsynced in > mid-July, there was a bug in Mach64PPCPreInit: > [...] > /* hack */ > pScrn->videoRam = 2048; > [...] > The hack to unconditionally set pScrn->videoRam to 2M should be removed, The rsync of atimach64ppc.c I got earlier today doesn't have this unconditonal assignment hack anymore. The hardwired vram setting certainly could have caused at least some of the problems I was running into on Friday. I'll try this new ati driver first thing Monday and report back. -- reshapiro@mediaone.net ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/