Re: Getting patches in (was: Re: Roles for distributions)
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <hidden>
Date: 2000-09-12 23:13:42
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 02:49:06AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Michel Lanners wrote:quoted
I agree that this seems to be a major problem of the PPC Linux port at this time. It is not clear at all how the flow of patches from user contribution, to PPC kernel tree, to Linus' tree is happening... and unfortunately, too often, it just isn't happening.Cort posted the following on linux-kernel, this past Thursday. (Cort quoted with ">", Till Straumann quoted with "}")quoted
} Can somebody please tell me, who is currently maintaining } arch/ppc? } } The link } } http://www.ppc.kernel.org/ } } in the MAINTAINERS file is dead. } } Regards, Till It's unmaintained right now. The www.ppc.kernel.org site is gone. Take a look at www.fsmlabs.com/linuxppcbk.html for the PPC tree.
Is someone planning to step up and take over, then, officially? Or is Cort going to be back? Dan /--------------------------------\ /--------------------------------\ | Daniel Jacobowitz |__| SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer __ Carnegie Mellon University | | dan@debian.org | | dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu | \--------------------------------/ \--------------------------------/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/