Re: RFC: Changing default partition type for linux/ppc

I think it's a great idea. I don't use MacOS so I don't share the concern of
how MacOS X could affect the partitions. Equally, I trust if Apple is properly
advised of such a change they would take measures to ensure compatibility.
Linux sells Apple hardware too. ;-)

Best Regards,
Charles Stevenson

On Fri, 07 Jul 2000, Hollis Blanchard wrote:

Tom Gall wrote:

quoted

Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

quoted

So I suggest moving to Linux_ext2, Linux_swap, or maybe simply Linux and
Linux_swap (since ext2 is not the only filesystem Linux may put on
these). Using a different type for swap would help avoiding confusion.

I agree. I think this is a good step. However there's the obvious interoperability
problems with MacOS, OS X etc... Hopefully Apple's OSes wouldn't do anything evil
to the partition they don't recognize.

Well, they don't at this point. For example in partitioning tool in
LinuxPPC 2000, LinuxPPC Inc decided it would be better to use the type
"Linux_PPC". This works (in that nothing gets overwritten, corrupted,
etc) but has the disadvantage that no other software knows anything
about that type.

If you were writing software it would be pretty poor form to find data
you didn't understand and decide to "fix" it. I know there are programs
like that out there (if you look at
http://www.win.tue.nl/~aeb/partitions/partition_types-1.html it seems
there is a rich history of them), but Apple seems to be doing well in
that regard so far...

Of course, everything may change with OS X but I would hope they don't
get malicious all of a sudden.

-Hollis

--
  Terra Soft Solutions, Inc.
  http://www.terrasoftsolutions.com/

  Yellow Dog Linux
  "The Ultimate Companion for a Dedicated Server"
  http://www.yellowdoglinux.com/

  Black Lab Linux
  Advanced Workstations, Parallel, and Embedded Solutions
  http://www.blacklablinux.com/


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/