Re: dmasound split
From: Jes Sorensen <hidden>
Date: 2000-03-14 11:37:45
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
"Michael" == Michael Schmitz [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Yep. Time to ship Andreas' TT to SuSE...
Michael> Looks like it. I never really understood what Jes wanted to Michael> change about the serial layer, and I don't have much time for Michael> that recently. The whole design was wrong. The old m68kserial implementation was running as a master layer controlling the low level devices. Instead it should be a library of routines the drivers can choose to use if they want to. The master approach puts too many restrictions onto the individual drivers. Linus rejected this approach more than two years ago, and it is never going into the official tree. I have been telling everybody this for just as long, but most people seem tohave just gotten tired of it and started ignoring the message. Jes PS: Sorry about random missing characters, the latency from Australia o Switzerland makes typing emails somewhat interesting. ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/