On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 09:06:38AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:

On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 2:43 AM Darrick J. Wong [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

I forgot to add spdx license tags and copyright statements to some of
the tools that I've contributed to fstests.  Fix this to be explicit.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

Is someone having an identity crisis? :-P

No, just an IT crisis.  @oracle.com is now exchange cloud, hence me
moving to kernel.org mail forwarding.  For licensing things I want to
make it clear that someone from oracle is adding an oracle copyright
statement.

--D

Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>

quoted

---
 common/preamble     |   21 ++++++++
 doc/group-names.txt |  135 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/mkgroupfile   |   33 +++++++++---
 3 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 doc/group-names.txt


diff
---
 tools/mkgroupfile |    4 +++-
 tools/mvtest      |    5 ++++-
 tools/nextid      |    4 +++-
 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/mkgroupfile b/tools/mkgroupfile
index e4244507..634ec92c 100755
--- a/tools/mkgroupfile
+++ b/tools/mkgroupfile

@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
 #!/bin/bash
-
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+# Copyright (c) 2021 Oracle.  All Rights Reserved.
+#
 # Generate a group file from the _begin_fstest call in each test.

 if [ "$1" = "--help" ]; then

diff --git a/tools/mvtest b/tools/mvtest
index 5088b45f..99b15414 100755
--- a/tools/mvtest
+++ b/tools/mvtest

@@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
 #!/bin/sh
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+# Copyright (c) 2015 Oracle.  All Rights Reserved.
+#

[...]

quoted

diff --git a/tools/nextid b/tools/nextid
index 9507de29..9e31718c 100755
--- a/tools/nextid
+++ b/tools/nextid

@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
 #!/bin/bash
-
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+# Copyright (c) 2015 Oracle.  All Rights Reserved.
+#

I suppose 2015 is intentional?
Should it be 2015-2021? I have no idea what the legal implications
are, but anyway, very low probability that those scripts would end up
in litigation :)

Thanks,
Amir.