Thread (37 messages) 37 messages, 4 authors, 2017-08-17

Re: [PATCH 5/6] mkfs: move getnum within the file

From: Eric Sandeen <hidden>
Date: 2017-08-15 21:09:20

On 8/15/17 5:14 AM, Jan Tulak wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 1:07 AM, Darrick J. Wong
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 02:30:36PM +0200, Jan Tulak wrote:
quoted
Move getnum, check_opt and illegal_option within the file. We have to do
this to avoid dependency issues with the following patch. There is no
other change in this patch, just cut&paste of these functions.

Signed-off-by: Jan Tulak <redacted>
---
 mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c | 236 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
 1 file changed, 118 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c b/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c
index e3f7d345..3e7ba5f0 100644
--- a/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c
+++ b/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c
@@ -813,6 +813,124 @@ get_conf_raw_safe(const int opt, const int subopt)
      return str;
 }

+static __attribute__((noreturn)) void
+illegal_option(
How about declaring the functions at the top and leaving the definitions
where they are?
If I remember, Eric thought the opposite. :-)
I don't remember, but at this point I'm ok with whatever, this part
just isn't that important.

Thanks,
-Eric
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help