Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE to fallocate
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Date: 2012-06-13 03:30:52
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:35:49AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 05:36:02PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:quoted
This patch adds the FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE operation mode to fallocate, resembling the similar XFS ioctl. The new mode can be used with or without FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE, but of course not together with FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE.!FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE makes no sense for this operation. It is for zeroing an existing section of a file while retaining the allocated space, not for extending or truncating the file. It's the same reason that FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE must have FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE set. Also, a minor nit, but you should credit where this code has originated from in the commit messages, and describe the use case for requiring it. i.e. based on: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.file-systems/62449
Oh, and you'll need to provide a new xfstests test based on 242 that uses the new fallocate interface, and to do that you'll also need to add support for the new fallocate function in xfs_io. Adding generic filesystem functionality is not as simple as writing a kernel patch anymore... :/ Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs