[bug report] rtw89: add Realtek 802.11ax driver

Hello Ping-Ke Shih,

The patch e3ec7017f6a2: "rtw89: add Realtek 802.11ax driver" from Oct
11, 2021, leads to the following Smatch static checker warning:

	drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c:586 hfc_ch_ctrl()
	warn: array off by one? 'cfg[ch]'

drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c
    568 static int hfc_ch_ctrl(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, u8 ch)
    569 {
    570         struct rtw89_hfc_param *param = &rtwdev->mac.hfc_param;
    571         const struct rtw89_hfc_ch_cfg *cfg = param->ch_cfg;
    572         int ret = 0;
    573         u32 val = 0;
    574 
    575         ret = rtw89_mac_check_mac_en(rtwdev, RTW89_MAC_0, RTW89_DMAC_SEL);
    576         if (ret)
    577                 return ret;
    578 
    579         ret = hfc_ch_cfg_chk(rtwdev, ch);
    580         if (ret)
    581                 return ret;
    582 
    583         if (ch > RTW89_DMA_B1HI)
                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    584                 return -EINVAL;
    585 
--> 586         val = u32_encode_bits(cfg[ch].min, B_AX_MIN_PG_MASK) |
    587               u32_encode_bits(cfg[ch].max, B_AX_MAX_PG_MASK) |
    588               (cfg[ch].grp ? B_AX_GRP : 0);

This is an unpublished Smatch warning which uses an "assume every >
comparison should be >= wrong until proven otherwise" approach.  In
this case, Smatch can't tell the size of the cfg[] array.

Manually it looks like cfg can only be rtw8852a_hfc_chcfg_pcie[] which
has RTW89_DMA_CH_NUM (13) elements.  Is there a reason why we don't use
the last element?  Also it's puzzling that the last element is
FWCMDQ instead of H2C.  So maybe that's the reason?

    589         rtw89_write32(rtwdev, R_AX_ACH0_PAGE_CTRL + ch * 4, val);
    590 
    591         return 0;
    592 }

regards,
dan carpenter