Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] dt: bindings: add new dt entries for brcmfmac
flat view
From: Alexey Roslyakov <hidden>
Date: 2018-03-20 09:35:53
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml, netdev
Arend, Agreed. Let's dismiss these patches. Now I'm curious if I can get the information about DMA SG limitations from MMC layer, I'll try to figure out something. BTW, my specific setup (with default alignments) triggers kernel panic (I see brcm_* in backtrace). It's better if I create separate email chain for the issue. Thanks, Alex. On 20 March 2018 at 16:03, Arend van Spriel [off-list ref] wrote:
On 3/20/2018 8:58 AM, Alexey Roslyakov wrote:quoted
Arend,quoted
Also I am not sure if the broken-sg-support is still needed. We added that for omap_hsmmc, but that has since changed to scatter-gather emulation so it might not be needed anymore.I can confirm it doesn't impact wifi performance in case of rk3288+ap6335. But I still have to set settings->bus.sdio.sd_head_align = 4 and settings->bus.sdio.sd_sgentry_align = 512, otherwise brcmf_sdiod_sglist_rw fails: 974.888452] net_ratelimit: 8 callbacks suppressed [ 974.888457] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdiod_sglist_rw: CMD53 sg block read failed -84 [ 974.901527] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_rxglom: glom read of 6144 bytes failed: -5 [ 974.910248] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_rxfail: abort command, terminate frame [ 975.018041] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdiod_sglist_rw: CMD53 sg block read failed -84 [ 975.025833] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_rxglom: glom read of 6144 bytes failed: -5 [ 975.033634] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_rxfail: abort command, terminate frame [ 975.033924] dwmmc_rockchip ff0d0000.dwmmc: Unexpected command timeout, state 0 [ 975.049209] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_readframes: RXHEADER FAILED: -84 [ 975.056034] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_rxfail: abort command, terminate frame, send NAK [ 975.068367] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_hdparse: HW header length too long [ 975.075379] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_rxfail: terminate frameHi Alex, Thanks for checking. In your case I think you do not need sd_head_align as it will default to either 4 or 8: #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT #define ALIGNMENT 8 #else #define ALIGNMENT 4 #endif I am not saying you should not be needing this. When it comes to DT people are often tempted to accommodate a driver solution especially when such a solution is already in place. However, DT is a hardware description and these do not describe the wifi device. They are applicable to the wifi device because it is a limitation of the host controller and as such should be described in the DT binding of the host controller. Regards, Arendquoted
Regards, Alex On 20 March 2018 at 06:16, Arend van Spriel [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
+ Uffe On 3/19/2018 6:55 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:quoted
On 03/19/2018 07:10 AM, Alexey Roslyakov wrote:quoted
Hi Arend, I appreciate your response. In my opinion, it has nothing to do with SDIO host, because it defines "quirks" in the driver itself.It is not clear to me from your patch series whether the problem is that: - the SDIO device has a specific alignment requirements, which would be either a SDIO device driver limitation/issue or maybe the underlying hardware device/firmware requiring that - the SDIO host controller used is not capable of coping nicely with these said limitations It seems to me like what you are doing here is a) applicable to possibly more SDIO devices and host combinations, and b) should likely be done at the layer between the host and device, such that it is available to more combinations.Indeed. That was my thought exactly and I can not imagine Uffe would push back on that reasoning.quoted
quoted
If I get it right, you mean something like this: mmc3: mmc@1c12000 { ... broken-sg-support; sd-head-align = 4; sd-sgentry-align = 512; brcmf: wifi@1 { ... }; }; Where dt: bindings documentation for these entries should reside? In generic MMC bindings? Well, this is the very special case and mmc-linux maintainer will unlikely to accept these changes. Also, extra kernel code modification might be required. It could make quite trivial change much more complex.If the MMC maintainers are not copied on this patch series, it will likely be hard for them to identify this patch series and chime in...The main question is whether this is indeed a "very special case" as Alexey claims it to be or that it is likely to be applicable to other device and host combinations as you are suggesting. If these properties are imposed by the host or host controller it would make sense to have these in the mmc bindings.quoted
quoted
quoted
Also I am not sure if the broken-sg-support is still needed. We added that for omap_hsmmc, but that has since changed to scatter-gather emulation so it might not be needed anymore.I've experienced the problem with rk3288 (dw-mmc host) and sdio settings like above solved it. Frankly, I haven't investigated any deeper which one of the settings helped in my case yet... I will try to get rid of broken-sg-support first and let you know if it does make any difference.Are you using some chromebook. I have some lying around here so I could also look into it. What broadcom chipset do you have? Regards, Arendquoted
quoted
All the best, Alex. On 19 March 2018 at 16:31, Arend van Spriel [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 3/19/2018 2:40 AM, Alexey Roslyakov wrote:quoted
In case if the host has higher align requirements for SG items, allow setting device-specific aligns for scatterlist items. Signed-off-by: Alexey Roslyakov <redacted> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/brcm,bcm43xx-fmac.txt | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/brcm,bcm43xx-fmac.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/brcm,bcm43xx-fmac.txt index 86602f264dce..187b8c1b52a7 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/brcm,bcm43xx-fmac.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/brcm,bcm43xx-fmac.txt@@ -17,6 +17,11 @@ Optional properties: When not specified the device will use in-band SDIOinterrupts. - interrupt-names : name of the out-of-band interrupt, which must be set to "host-wake". + - brcm,broken-sg-support : boolean flag to indicate that the SDIO host + controller has higher align requirement than 32 bytes for each + scatterlist item. + - brcm,sd-head-align : alignment requirement for start of data buffer. + - brcm,sd-sgentry-align : length alignment requirement for each sg entry.Hi Alexey, Thanks for the patch. However, the problem with these is that they are characterizing the host controller and not the wireless device. So from device tree perspective , which is to describe the hardware, these properties should be SDIO host controller properties. Also I am not sure if the broken-sg-support is still needed. We added that for omap_hsmmc, but that has since changed to scatter-gather emulation so it might not be needed anymore. Regards, Arend
-- With best regards, Alexey Roslyakov Email: alexey.roslyakov@gmail.com