Re: [RFC] ath10k: silence firmware file probing warnings
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Date: 2016-08-03 14:22:08
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 01:33:31PM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 02-08-16 16:16, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:quoted
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 11:10:22AM +0000, Valo, Kalle wrote:quoted
"Luis R. Rodriguez" [off-list ref] writes:quoted
I was considering this as a future extension to the firmware API through the new extensible firmware API, the sysdata API.I think Linus mentioned this already, but I want to reiterate anyway. The name "sysdata" is horrible, I didn't have any idea what it means until I read your description. Please continue to use the term "firmware", anyone already know what it means.We've gone well past using the firmware API for firmware though, if we use it for 802.11 to replace CRDA for instance its really odd to be calling it firmware. But sure... I will rebrand again to firmware...I tend to agree. Although some people even call an OpenWrt image firmware. Guess it is just in the eye of the beholder.
Sure... Come to think of it I'll still go with "sysdata", this is a very minor detail, do let me know if there is anything technical rather than the color of the bikeshed [0] over the patches. If you'd like another color in my bikeshed please let me know what color exactly you prefer and I'll consider it. [0] http://phk.freebsd.dk/sagas/bikeshed.html Luis