Hi Bhaktipriya,

On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Jes Sorensen [off-list ref] wrote:

Bhaktipriya Shridhar [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

This patch fixes checkpatch.pl warning in rtw_mlme_ext.c file.
WARNING: void function return statements are not generally useful

Signed-off-by: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <redacted>
---
 drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c | 10 ----------
 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
index d28f29a..e8a16b9 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c

@@ -2657,7 +2657,6 @@ static void issue_probersp(struct rtw_adapter *padapter, unsigned char *da)

      dump_mgntframe23a(padapter, pmgntframe);

-     return;
 }

If you insist on pushing this rather unncessary change, please do it
properly, and remove the blank line before the return statement as well.

As Jes said, you need to remove the blank lines before the returns
too. checkpatch should have picked this up, you did run the patch
through checkpatch before you sent it, right?

Jes,

I know you have strong feelings on coding style, but there are a lot
of people out there who see deviations from the standard as bugs to be
fixed, so stuff like this isn't going to stop until it matches the
coding style document's spec.

Thanks,

-- 
Julian Calaby

Email: julian.calaby@gmail.com
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/