Re: [PATCH 1/3] NFC-mei_phy: Refactoring for mei_nfc_connect() | linux-wireless | Ratatoskr

(off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
[PATCH 0/3] NFC-mei_phy: Fine-tuning for two function implementations · SF Markus Elfring <hidden> · 2016-01-02
[PATCH 1/3] NFC-mei_phy: Refactoring for mei_nfc_connect() · SF Markus Elfring <hidden> · 2016-01-02
Re: [PATCH 1/3] NFC-mei_phy: Refactoring for mei_nfc_connect() · Julian Calaby <hidden> · 2016-01-02
Re: [PATCH 1/3] NFC-mei_phy: Refactoring for mei_nfc_connect() · SF Markus Elfring <hidden> · 2016-01-03
Re: [PATCH 1/3] NFC-mei_phy: Refactoring for mei_nfc_connect() · Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> · 2016-01-03
[PATCH 2/3] NFC-mei_phy: Refactoring for mei_nfc_if_version() · SF Markus Elfring <hidden> · 2016-01-02
[PATCH 3/3] NFC-mei_phy: Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in mei_nfc_if_version() · SF Markus Elfring <hidden> · 2016-01-02

Re: [PATCH 1/3] NFC-mei_phy: Refactoring for mei_nfc_connect()

From: SF Markus Elfring <hidden>
Date: 2016-01-03 07:00:52
Also in: kernel-janitors, lkml

quoted

        r = 0;
-
-err:
+free_reply:
        kfree(reply);
+free_cmd:
        kfree(cmd);
-

Why are you deleting the two blank lines here?

Can they be unnecessary at this source code place
according to the Linux coding style convention?

Regards,
Markus