* Luciano Coelho [off-list ref] [130702 13:33]:

On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 10:02 -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:

quoted

On 17:55-20130702, Luciano Coelho wrote:

quoted

Instead of defining an enumeration with the FW specific values for the
different clock rates, use the actual frequency instead.  Also add a
boolean to specify whether the clock is XTAL or not.

Change all board files to reflect this.

Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c      |    3 +-
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c          |    5 ++-

^^

quoted

 arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c         |    3 +-
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c       |    3 +-

^^
Please do not add more platform data to platforms that are DT only.

Ah, I hadn't realized that board_omap4panda.c and board-4430sdp.c had
been removed in linux-next.  I base my tree on wireless-next and it
doesn't contain these changes yet.  I would only have noticed this when
I rebased my tree once the merge window is closed. ;)

Thanks for pointing out, I'll make sure these changes will not be there
when I send the pull request.

Please separate out the minimal pdata and arch/arm/mach-omap2 changes int
a immutable branch on v3.11-rc1 that I can also pull in. For v3.12, we're
going to be making more boards device tree only, so these changes may
otherwise cause pointless merge conflicts.

Regards,

Tony