Thread (32 messages) 32 messages, 7 authors, 2013-09-22

Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] wl12xx: use frequency instead of enumerations for pdata clocks

From: Luciano Coelho <hidden>
Date: 2013-07-02 20:28:28
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, linux-omap, lkml

On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 10:02 -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 17:55-20130702, Luciano Coelho wrote:
quoted
Instead of defining an enumeration with the FW specific values for the
different clock rates, use the actual frequency instead.  Also add a
boolean to specify whether the clock is XTAL or not.

Change all board files to reflect this.

Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c      |    3 +-
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c          |    5 ++-
^^
quoted
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c         |    3 +-
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c       |    3 +-
^^
Please do not add more platform data to platforms that are DT only.
Ah, I hadn't realized that board_omap4panda.c and board-4430sdp.c had
been removed in linux-next.  I base my tree on wireless-next and it
doesn't contain these changes yet.  I would only have noticed this when
I rebased my tree once the merge window is closed. ;)

Thanks for pointing out, I'll make sure these changes will not be there
when I send the pull request.

--
Cheers,
Luca.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help