On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 17:46 -0500, Nikolay Martynov wrote:

quoted

Maybe the better approach would be to bump it up, but also only allow an
attempt once every say 15 seconds or so? It seems kinda useless to try 3
(or 10/15) times in quick succession and then give up, vs. just trying
more spaced out?

  Makes sense to me. Although I would left first 2-3 go quickly in
case first was lost due to random glitch there is no reason to wait 15
seconds. But if first 2-3 fail - it make sense split next apart, I
think.

Seems ok to me, want to implement it? :)

johannes