Re: [RFC PATCH] usb: xhci-mtk: handle bandwidth table rollover
From: Chunfeng Yun (云春峰) <Chunfeng.Yun@mediatek.com>
Date: 2021-08-11 09:02:46
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, 2021-08-09 at 17:42 +0800, Ikjoon Jang wrote:
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 5:11 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 04:59:29PM +0800, Ikjoon Jang wrote:quoted
xhci-mtk has 64 slots for periodic bandwidth calculations and each slot represents byte budgets on a microframe. When an endpoint's allocation sits on the boundary of the table, byte budgets' slot should be rolled over but the current implementation doesn't. This patch applies a 6 bits mask to the microframe index to handle its rollover 64 slots and prevent out-of-bounds array access. Signed-off-by: Ikjoon Jang <redacted> --- drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk-sch.c | 79 +++++++++---------------- -------- drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)Why is this "RFC"? What needs to be addressed in this change before it can be accepted?sorry, I had to mention why this is RFC: I simply don't know about the details of the xhci-mtk internals. It was okay from my tests with mt8173 and I think this will be harmless as this is "better than before". But when I removed get_esit_boundary(), I really have no idea why it was there. I'm wondering if there was another reason of that function other than just preventing out-of-bounds. Maybe chunfeng can answer this?
We use @esit to prevent out-of-bounds array access. it's not a ring, can't insert out-of-bounds value into head slot.
Thanks!quoted
thanks, greg k-h