On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 5:11 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
[off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 04:59:29PM +0800, Ikjoon Jang wrote:
quoted
xhci-mtk has 64 slots for periodic bandwidth calculations and each
slot represents byte budgets on a microframe. When an endpoint's
allocation sits on the boundary of the table, byte budgets' slot
should be rolled over but the current implementation doesn't.
This patch applies a 6 bits mask to the microframe index to handle
its rollover 64 slots and prevent out-of-bounds array access.
Signed-off-by: Ikjoon Jang <redacted>
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk-sch.c | 79 +++++++++------------------------
drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
Why is this "RFC"? What needs to be addressed in this change before it
can be accepted?
sorry, I had to mention why this is RFC:
I simply don't know about the details of the xhci-mtk internals.
It was okay from my tests with mt8173 and I think this will be harmless
as this is "better than before".
But when I removed get_esit_boundary(), I really have no idea why
it was there. I'm wondering if there was another reason of that function
other than just preventing out-of-bounds. Maybe chunfeng can answer this?
Thanks!
thanks,
greg k-h