Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] IR driver for USB-UIRT device
From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-05-14 11:16:49
Also in:
linux-media
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:32:19AM +0100, Sean Young wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 10:15:14AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:quoted
On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 01:44:52PM +0100, Sean Young wrote:quoted
This is a new rc-core driver for the USB-UIRT which you can see here http://www.usbuirt.com/ This device is supported in lirc, via the usb serial kernel driver. This driver is both for rc-core, which means it can use kernel/BPF decoding ec. Also this implement is superior because it can: - support learning mode - setting transmit carrier - larger transmits using streaming tx commandThis looks like something which should have been implemented as a line-discipline or serdev driver instead of reimplementing a minimal on-off ftdi driver and tying it closely to the RC subsystem.The device is an infrared device, I'm not sure what it is lost by doing it this way. The "minimal on-off ftdi driver" is super trivial.
It's still code duplication (and I meant to say "one-off" above"). What is preventing you from supporting the above functionality through lirc?
quoted
Why can't you just add support for the above features to whatever subsystem is managing this device today? Serdev still doesn't support hotplugging unfortunately so that route may take a bit more work.There seems to be at least three ways of attaching drivers to serial devices: serio, serdev, and line-discipline. All seem to have limitations, as you say none of them provide a way of hotplugging devices without user-space attaching them through an ioctl or so.
serio is also a line-discipline driver, which unlike serdev needs to be set up by user space. And the problem with serdev is that it does not (yet) support hotplugging (specifically hangups) so it can't be enabled for USB serial just yet.
If you want to go down this route, then ideally you'd want a quirk on fdti saying "attach usb-uirt serdev device to this pid/vid". Considering module dependencies, I don't know how that could work without again userspace getting involved.
We'd just reuse or add another matching mechanism for USB devices. This can be handled without user-space interaction just fine as long as you have a dedicated device id as you do here.
Getting userspace involved seem like a big song and dance because the device uses an fdti device, even though it's not a serial port because it's hardwired for infrared functions, no db9 connector in sight.
Far from every USB serial device have a db9 connector (e.g. modems, barcode scanners, development board consoles, etc.) and you still have a UART in your device. In principle reimplementing a one-off ftdi driver is wrong but since parts of the infrastructure needed to avoid this is still missing it may be acceptable, especially if you can't get this to work with lirc. Johan