Thread (34 messages) 34 messages, 3 authors, 2021-03-18

Re: [PATCH 0/6] usbip fixes to crashes found by syzbot

From: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2021-03-17 16:11:16
Also in: lkml

On 3/17/21 12:21 AM, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
Shuah, this driver is getting more and more cryptic and buggy.
Please explain the strategy for serialization before you write patches.
quoted
- Fix attach_store() to check usbip_event_happened() before
   waking up threads.
No, this helps nothing.
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c
index c4b4256e5dad3..f0a770adebd97 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c
@@ -418,6 +418,15 @@ static ssize_t attach_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vhci->lock, flags);
  	/* end the lock */
  
+	if (usbip_event_happened(&vdev->ud)) {
+		/*
+		 * something went wrong - event handler shutting
+		 * the connection and doing reset - bail out
+		 */
+		dev_err(dev, "Event happended - handler is active\n");
+		return -EAGAIN;
+	}
+
detach_store() can queue shutdown event as soon as reaching "/* end the lock */" line
but attach_store() might be preempted immediately after verifying that
usbip_event_happened() was false (i.e. at this location) in order to wait for
shutdown event posted by detach_store() to be processed.
Yes. I haven't sent the patch for that reason. I am trying to test a
solution. I haven't come up with a solution yet.

Holding event_lock isn't the right solution. I am not going to accept
that. This is a window that gets triggered by syzbot injecting errors
in a sequence. Fixing this should be done taking other moving parts of
the driver into account.

thanks,
-- Shuah
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help