Re: [uml-devel] linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)

Am 14.08.2012 16:51, schrieb David Howells:

Richard Weinberger [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Is there no way to get this information from the UML subarch?
Which is currently X86_32 or X86_64.

Or ppc or ia64?  Or are those defunct?

Those are defunct.
AFAIK viro is working on UML/ppc64.

I can certainly try pasting the lines from x86/Kconfig to uml/Kconfig.common
to switch the REL/RELA bits, but it would be nice to get this from the actual
arch if possible to reduce redundancy.

The issue happens only on -next, right?
I can have a closer look at the issue tomorrow.

Thanks,
//richard