Re: [PATCH 1/5] um: Use __i386__ in ifdef for vsyscall exports, not SUBARCH_i386
From: richard -rw- weinberger <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-11 12:13:24
Also in:
linux-kbuild, lkml
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Al Viro [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 06:44:32PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:quoted
Fixed and pushed (um-header.git #master); however, looking around that area shows more races ;-/Such as, for example, seriously broken handling of free_winch(): delaying free_irq() until after return from IRQ handler is nice, but not enough - freeing struct winch itself (or winch->stack, for that matter) is also best left until after free_irq(). Normal way to do that is schedule_work()... Fixed and pushed... Folks, I don't know what to do with all that stuff; as far as I'm concerned the ideal variant would be to have functioning git tree maintained by Richard. Is that possible? I can ask to start pulling um-header.git into linux-next, but I would very much prefer to avoid that, TYVM... If nothing else, ACK/NAK on the stuff in there should be done by architecture maintainer(s).
Sorry for the delay. Writing my theses consumes a lot of my time... I've already started reviewing and testing your changes. Currently they life in my local git repo. But a git.kernel.org repo is on the way! Later I'll submit all changes to akpm. -- Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/