[uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/3] uml: share page bits handling between 2 and 3 level pagetables
From: Jeff Dike <hidden>
Date: 2005-08-12 17:35:17
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 09:37:28PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
Just noticed: you can drop them (except the first, which is a nice cleanup). set_pte handles that, and include/asm-generic/pgtable.h uses coherently set_pte_at. I've checked UML by examining "grep pte", and either mk_pte or set_pte are used. Exceptions: fixaddr_user_init (but that should be ok as we shouldn't map it actually), pte_modify() (which handles that only for present pages). But pte_modify is used with set_pte, so probably we could as well drop that handling. Also look, on the "set_pte" theme, at the attached patch. I realized this when I needed those lines to work - I was getting a segfault loop.
OK, this sounds right. To recap, we were concerned that when the page scanner went around clearing dirty (accessed) bits, that fix_range_common wasn't write (read) protecting the page in order to emulate the cleared bits. However, set_pte does set _PAGE_NEWPAGE, which forces the page through a full update, including dirty/accessed bit emulation. Correct? However, I did add some parenthesis to your patch: WARN_ON(!pte_young(*pte) || (pte_write(*pte) && !pte_dirty(*pte))); This seems clearer to me. So, your pte consolidation patch is still in my tree, the other two pte patches are dropped.
After using set_pte(), things worked. I have now an almost perfectly working implementation of remap_file_pages with protection support. There will probably be some other things to update, like swapping locations, but I can't get this kernel to fail (it's easier to find bugs in the test-program, it grew quite complex).
Excellent.
I'm going to clean up the code and write changelogs, to send then the patches for -mm (hoping the page fault scalability patches don't get in the way).
Good. Jeff ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel