Re: [Valgrind-users] Re: [uml-devel] Re: UML and valgrind
From: Nicholas Nethercote <hidden>
Date: 2004-08-03 22:04:47
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Jeff Dike wrote:
quoted
+ pushl %eax + movl VG_(m_state_static)+60, %eax + movl %eax, save_ip + popl %eax
m_state_static doesn't exist anymore. You could try getting the simulated %eip out of the 'baseBlock' -- it starts at VG_(baseBlock), and %eip is VGOFF_(m_eip) *words* into it, ie. 4*VGOFF_(m_eax) bytes into it. I'm not certain that the simulated %eip is up-to-date exactly as necessary, but it could be. The rest of the patch would work the same way.
Also, I saw this:quoted
valgrind: the `impossible' happened: Unhandled REPE caseIf you see this, check that you have http://www.goop.org/~jeremy/valgrind/76-repe-scas.patch and apply if not.
That should be fixed in all recent versions of Valgrind. HTH N ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel