Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 4 authors, 2004-08-04

Re: [Valgrind-users] Re: [uml-devel] Re: UML and valgrind

From: Nicholas Nethercote <hidden>
Date: 2004-08-03 22:04:47

On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Jeff Dike wrote:
quoted
+       pushl   %eax
+       movl    VG_(m_state_static)+60, %eax
+       movl    %eax, save_ip
+       popl    %eax
m_state_static doesn't exist anymore.  You could try getting the simulated 
%eip out of the 'baseBlock' -- it starts at VG_(baseBlock), and %eip is 
VGOFF_(m_eip) *words* into it, ie. 4*VGOFF_(m_eax) bytes into it.  I'm not 
certain that the simulated %eip is up-to-date exactly as necessary, but it 
could be.  The rest of the patch would work the same way.
Also, I saw this:
quoted
	valgrind: the `impossible' happened:
	   Unhandled REPE case
If you see this, check that you have
	http://www.goop.org/~jeremy/valgrind/76-repe-scas.patch
and apply if not.
That should be fixed in all recent versions of Valgrind.

HTH

N


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on
Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now,
one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology
Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help