Re: [PATCH v15 03/12] x86/hw_breakpoints: Add arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() API
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Date: 2026-09-14 05:13:21
Also in:
linux-perf-users, sashiko-reviews
On Mon, 07 Sep 2026 04:02:03 +0000 sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider: - [High] Modifying a debug address register while the breakpoint is enabled in DR7 violates the Intel SDM. This can occur due to a race condition with an NMI because the `cpu_dr7` shadow state is not temporarily updated. -- commit ca38cc4e9ed0533dfe16175c78dba60903420a8b Author: Jinchao Wang [off-list ref] x86/hw_breakpoints: Add arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() API Wprobe needs to move an active per-CPU watchpoint without releasing and reserving its hardware slot. Add arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() as the architecture backend for modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr(). It validates the new address, finds the installed local slot, and updates the hardware debug register and per-CPU shadow register. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/59637b96946653393a7ad3c7de094094796b39c2.1785067572.git.wangjinchao600@gmail.com/ (local)quoted
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c index 312550be3ad2b..99f0926298a85 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c[ ... ]quoted
@@ -129,6 +129,62 @@ int arch_install_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp)[ ... ]quoted
+ do { + seq = this_cpu_inc_return(cpu_dr7_seq); + + /* Disable breakpoint in DR7 before updating address register */ + dr7 = this_cpu_read(cpu_dr7); + set_debugreg((dr7 & ~__encode_dr7(i, info->len, info->type)) | DR7_FIXED_1, 7);[Severity: High] Does arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() need to clear the breakpoint in the shadow cpu_dr7 state as well?
Ah, OK, let's update cpu_dr7 too.
Since the breakpoint isn't cleared in the cpu_dr7 shadow state, could an NMI that interrupts execution here inadvertently re-enable the breakpoint prematurely? If an NMI handler (such as kgdb or perf) modifies breakpoints, it increments cpu_dr7_seq and invokes local_db_save() and local_db_restore(). When the NMI completes, local_db_restore() detects the sequence mismatch and restores hardware DR7 using the cpu_dr7 shadow cache. Because cpu_dr7 still has this breakpoint enabled, the target breakpoint gets re-enabled in hardware DR7 before the execution below resumes.quoted
+ barrier(); + + this_cpu_write(cpu_debugreg[i], addr); + barrier(); + set_debugreg(addr, i);[Severity: High] If an NMI prematurely restored DR7 as described above, won't this modify the debug address register while the breakpoint is enabled in DR7?
This also needs to update cpu_dr7. Thank you,
Modifying a debug address register while its corresponding DR7 enable bit is set violates the Intel SDM and causes spurious #DB exceptions. While the sequence loop retry mechanism will catch the mismatch, it only does so after this instruction has already executed, which is too late to prevent the spurious exception.quoted
+ barrier(); + + /* Re-enable breakpoint in DR7 */ + set_debugreg(this_cpu_read(cpu_dr7) | DR7_FIXED_1, 7); + barrier(); + } while (seq != this_cpu_read(cpu_dr7_seq)); + + return 0; +}-- Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/178875277830.93794.14247844688761142429.stgit@devnote2?part=3
-- Masami Hiramatsu (Google) [off-list ref]