Re: [PATCH v11 00/15] khugepaged: mTHP support
From: David Hildenbrand <hidden>
Date: 2025-09-15 10:37:38
Also in:
linux-doc, linux-mm, lkml
From: David Hildenbrand <hidden>
Date: 2025-09-15 10:37:38
Also in:
linux-doc, linux-mm, lkml
On 15.09.25 12:32, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 12:25:54PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
I would just say "The kernel might decide to use a more conservative approach when collapsing smaller THPs" etc. Thoughts?Well I've sort of reviewed oppositely there :) well at least that it needs to be a hell of a lot clearer (I find that comment really compressed and I just don't really understand it).Right. I think these are just details we should hide from the user. And in particular, not over-document it so we can more easily change semantics later.And when we change semantics we can't change comments? I mean maybe we're talking across purposes here, I'm talking about code comments, not the documentation. I agree the documentation should not mention any of this.
Yes, I was talking about patch #15 ("It's just when it comes to
documenting all that stuff in patch #15").
Comments we can adjust as we please of course :)
--
Cheers
David / dhildenb