Re: [PATCH 5/5] rv: Add rts monitor
From: Nam Cao <hidden>
Date: 2025-08-05 12:22:19
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, Aug 05, 2025 at 10:40:30AM +0200, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
Hello Nam, I just built and booted up the monitor in a VM (virtme-ng), the configuration has preemptirq tracepoints and all monitors so far (as we have seen earlier, it doesn't build if rtapp monitors are not there because of the circular dependency in the tracepoints). All I did was to enable the monitor and printk reactor, but I get a whole lot of errors (as in, I need to quit the VM for it to stop): [ 1537.699834] rv: rts: 7: violation detected [ 1537.699930] rv: rts: 3: violation detected [ 1537.701827] rv: rts: 6: violation detected [ 1537.704894] rv: rts: 0: violation detected [ 1537.704925] rv: rts: 0: violation detected [ 1537.704988] rv: rts: 3: violation detected [ 1537.705019] rv: rts: 3: violation detected [ 1537.705998] rv: rts: 0: violation detected [ 1537.706024] rv: rts: 0: violation detected [ 1537.709875] rv: rts: 6: violation detected [ 1537.709921] rv: rts: 6: violation detected [ 1537.711241] rv: rts: 6: violation detected Curiously enough, I only see those CPUs (0, 3, 6 and 7). Other runs have different CPUs but always a small subset (e.g. 10-15, 6-7 only 2). It doesn't always occur but enabling/disabling the monitor might help triggering it. Any idea what is happening?
Thanks for the report. I can reproduce the issue. Looking at the tracepoints, it makes sense why the monitor complains, some RT tasks are enqueued but are not dequeued. Then a sched_switch happens which switches to a non-RT task. Most likely the dequeue tracepoint misses some cases, let me investigate.. Nam