Thread (32 messages) 32 messages, 3 authors, 2025-08-06

Re: [PATCH 1/5] rv/ltl: Prepare for other monitor types

From: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
Date: 2025-07-31 10:14:10
Also in: lkml

On Thu, 2025-07-31 at 11:28 +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 11:04:44AM +0200, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
quoted
I stole your solution to get rid of macros for the DA as well
(might
post it after this merge window or with the next changes) and I'm
currently running with this:
Nice, glad you like it.

For global monitor, you could do

     typdef struct {} monitor_target;

     static monitor_target rv_global_target;
Well, implicit monitors (cpu and global for DA) don't really have a
target but I'll probably be using this for other types if necessary or
in case I'm unifying things. Which might be nice, if it didn't require
modifying all per-cpu monitors (where CPU is not passed because the
current one is assumed).
I didn't check clang, but gcc does not emit anything for this. So
effectively the compiled code does not have the "target" parameter.
quoted
diff --git a/include/linux/rv.h b/include/linux/rv.h
index 14410a42faef..6a7594080db1 100644
--- a/include/linux/rv.h
+++ b/include/linux/rv.h
@@ -13,6 +13,10 @@
 #define MAX_DA_NAME_LEN			32
 #define MAX_DA_RETRY_RACING_EVENTS	3
 
+#define RV_MON_GLOBAL   0
+#define RV_MON_PER_CPU  1
+#define RV_MON_PER_TASK 2
+

The numbers don't really matter and you don't need to implement
all, of
course.
That makes sense, will do.
quoted
I'm not sure how are our patches going to coordinate,
Let's just post them. The one whose patches are not applied first
will have to rebase. It is a trivial rebase anyway.
Sure then, git may be smart enough to see there aren't conflicts.

Thanks,
Gabriele
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help