[PATCH v9 1/7] Get rid of __get_task_comm()
From: Yafang Shao <hidden>
Date: 2024-10-07 14:49:45
Also in:
bpf, dri-devel, linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, linux-security-module, netdev, selinux
Subsystem:
exec & binfmt api, elf, filesystems (vfs and infrastructure), proc filesystem, scheduler, the rest · Maintainers:
Kees Cook, Alexander Viro, Christian Brauner, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Juri Lelli, Vincent Guittot, Linus Torvalds
We want to eliminate the use of __get_task_comm() for the following reasons: - The task_lock() is unnecessary Quoted from Linus [0]: : Since user space can randomly change their names anyway, using locking : was always wrong for readers (for writers it probably does make sense : to have some lock - although practically speaking nobody cares there : either, but at least for a writer some kind of race could have : long-term mixed results Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wivfrF0_zvf+oj6==Sh=-npJooP8chLPEfaFV0oNYTTBA@mail.gmail.com (local) [0] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=whWtUC-AjmGJveAETKOMeMFSTwKwu99v7+b6AyHMmaDFA@mail.gmail.com/ (local) Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <redacted> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Eric Biederman <redacted> Cc: Kees Cook <redacted> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <redacted> Cc: Matus Jokay <redacted> Cc: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org> Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> --- fs/exec.c | 10 ---------- fs/proc/array.c | 2 +- include/linux/sched.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------ kernel/kthread.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index 6c53920795c2..77364806b48d 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c@@ -1189,16 +1189,6 @@ static int unshare_sighand(struct task_struct *me) return 0; } -char *__get_task_comm(char *buf, size_t buf_size, struct task_struct *tsk) -{ - task_lock(tsk); - /* Always NUL terminated and zero-padded */ - strscpy_pad(buf, tsk->comm, buf_size); - task_unlock(tsk); - return buf; -} -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__get_task_comm); - /* * These functions flushes out all traces of the currently running executable * so that a new one can be started
diff --git a/fs/proc/array.c b/fs/proc/array.c
index 34a47fb0c57f..55ed3510d2bb 100644
--- a/fs/proc/array.c
+++ b/fs/proc/array.c@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ void proc_task_name(struct seq_file *m, struct task_struct *p, bool escape) else if (p->flags & PF_KTHREAD) get_kthread_comm(tcomm, sizeof(tcomm), p); else - __get_task_comm(tcomm, sizeof(tcomm), p); + get_task_comm(tcomm, p); if (escape) seq_escape_str(m, tcomm, ESCAPE_SPACE | ESCAPE_SPECIAL, "\n\\");
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index e6ee4258169a..28f92c637abf 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h@@ -1121,9 +1121,12 @@ struct task_struct { /* * executable name, excluding path. * - * - normally initialized setup_new_exec() - * - access it with [gs]et_task_comm() - * - lock it with task_lock() + * - normally initialized begin_new_exec() + * - set it with set_task_comm() + * - strscpy_pad() to ensure it is always NUL-terminated and + * zero-padded + * - task_lock() to ensure the operation is atomic and the name is + * fully updated. */ char comm[TASK_COMM_LEN];
@@ -1938,10 +1941,23 @@ static inline void set_task_comm(struct task_struct *tsk, const char *from) __set_task_comm(tsk, from, false); } -extern char *__get_task_comm(char *to, size_t len, struct task_struct *tsk); +/* + * - Why not use task_lock()? + * User space can randomly change their names anyway, so locking for readers + * doesn't make sense. For writers, locking is probably necessary, as a race + * condition could lead to long-term mixed results. + * The strscpy_pad() in __set_task_comm() can ensure that the task comm is + * always NUL-terminated and zero-padded. Therefore the race condition between + * reader and writer is not an issue. + * + * - BUILD_BUG_ON() can help prevent the buf from being truncated. + * Since the callers don't perform any return value checks, this safeguard is + * necessary. + */ #define get_task_comm(buf, tsk) ({ \ - BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(buf) != TASK_COMM_LEN); \ - __get_task_comm(buf, sizeof(buf), tsk); \ + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(buf) < TASK_COMM_LEN); \ + strscpy_pad(buf, (tsk)->comm); \ + buf; \ }) #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
diff --git a/kernel/kthread.c b/kernel/kthread.c
index db4ceb0f503c..74d20f46fa30 100644
--- a/kernel/kthread.c
+++ b/kernel/kthread.c@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ void get_kthread_comm(char *buf, size_t buf_size, struct task_struct *tsk) struct kthread *kthread = to_kthread(tsk); if (!kthread || !kthread->full_name) { - __get_task_comm(buf, buf_size, tsk); + strscpy(buf, tsk->comm, buf_size); return; }
--
2.43.5