On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 06:58:30 +0000
"Zhuo, Qiuxu" [off-list ref] wrote:

When running the check below: 

    ${LINUX}/scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict  <this patch> 

it complains:

    CHECK: Macro argument 'el_size' may be better as '(el_size)' to avoid precedence issues
    #36: FILE: include/trace/stages/stage3_trace_output.h:123:
    +#define __print_dynamic_array(array, el_size)                          \
    +       ({                                                              \
    +               __print_array(__get_dynamic_array(array),               \
    +                             __get_dynamic_array_len(array) / el_size, \
    +                             el_size);                                 \
    +       })

For once I actually agree with checkpatch in an include/trace file.

I can send another version for you.

-- Steve