Re: [RFC PATCH 24/32] x86/ftrace: Enable HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FREGS
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-11-07 00:43:09
Also in:
bpf, lkml
On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 11:37:10 -0500 Steven Rostedt [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 10:05:49 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu (Google) [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
So for x86-64, - rdi, rsi, rcx, rdx, r8, r9, and rsp - rax and rdx - rbp (BTW, why orig_rax is cleared?)You mean from ftrace_caller? That's a "hack" to determine if we need to call the direct trampoline or not. When you have both a direct trampoline and ftrace functions on the same function, it will call ftrace_ops_list_func() to iterate all the registered ftrace callbacks. The direct callback helper will set "orig_rax" to let the return of the ftrace trampoline call the direct callback.
Got it. So does ftrace_regs need a placeholder for direct trampoline? (Or, can we use a register to pass it?) I think we don't need to clear it for return_to_handler() but if `ftrace_regs` spec requires it, it is better to do so. Thank you,
Remember if a direct callback is by itself, the fentry will call that direct trampoline without going through the ftrace trampoline. This is used to tell the ftrace trampoline that it's attached to a direct caller and needs to call that and not return back to the function it is tracing. See later down in that file we have: /* * If ORIG_RAX is anything but zero, make this a call to that. * See arch_ftrace_set_direct_caller(). */ testq %rax, %rax -- Steve
-- Masami Hiramatsu (Google) [off-list ref]