Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/6] tracing/fprobe: Enable fprobe events with CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-08-09 14:45:21
Also in:
bpf, lkml
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-08-09 14:45:21
Also in:
bpf, lkml
On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 12:31:00 +0200 Florent Revest [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 8:49 AM Masami Hiramatsu (Google) [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> Allow fprobe events to be enabled with CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS. With this change, fprobe events mostly use ftrace_regs instead of pt_regs. Note that if the arch doesn't enable HAVE_PT_REGS_COMPAT_FTRACE_REGS, fprobe events will not be able to use from perf.nit: "to be used from perf" ?
OK.
quoted
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_fprobe.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_fprobe.c@@ -132,25 +132,30 @@ static int process_fetch_insn(struct fetch_insn *code, void *rec, void *dest, void *base) { - struct pt_regs *regs = rec; - unsigned long val; + struct ftrace_regs *fregs = rec; + unsigned long val, *stackp; int ret; retry: /* 1st stage: get value from context */ switch (code->op) { case FETCH_OP_STACK: - val = regs_get_kernel_stack_nth(regs, code->param); + stackp = (unsigned long *)ftrace_regs_get_stack_pointer(fregs); + if (((unsigned long)(stackp + code->param) & ~(THREAD_SIZE - 1)) == + ((unsigned long)stackp & ~(THREAD_SIZE - 1)))Maybe it'd be worth extracting a local "ftrace_regs_get_kernel_stack_nth_addr" helper function and/or "ftrace_regs_within_kernel_stack" ?
Yeah, maybe we can make it a generic inline function in linux/ftrace.h. Thank you! -- Masami Hiramatsu (Google) [off-list ref]