Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] bpf: fprobe: rethook: Use ftrace_regs instead of pt_regs
From: Florent Revest <hidden>
Date: 2023-08-08 17:32:43
Also in:
bpf, lkml
On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 8:48 AM Masami Hiramatsu (Google) [off-list ref] wrote:
Florent, feel free to add your rethook for arm64, but please do not remove kretprobe trampoline yet. It is another discussion point. We may be possible to use ftrace_regs for kretprobe by ftrace_partial_regs() but kretprobe allows nest probe. (maybe we can skip that case?)
Ack :)
arch/Kconfig | 1 + arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h | 11 ++++++ arch/loongarch/Kconfig | 1 + arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 + arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 + arch/x86/kernel/rethook.c | 9 +++-- include/linux/fprobe.h | 4 +- include/linux/ftrace.h | 56 ++++++++++++++++++----------- include/linux/rethook.h | 11 +++--- kernel/kprobes.c | 9 ++++- kernel/trace/Kconfig | 9 ++++- kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 14 +++++-- kernel/trace/fprobe.c | 8 ++-- kernel/trace/rethook.c | 16 ++++---- kernel/trace/trace_fprobe.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- kernel/trace/trace_probe_tmpl.h | 2 + lib/test_fprobe.c | 10 +++-- samples/fprobe/fprobe_example.c | 4 +-
I believe that Documentation/trace/fprobe.rst should also be modified following the API change