Re: [PATCH rdma-next 00/13] Add RDMA inline crypto support
From: Israel Rukshin <hidden>
Date: 2023-01-23 12:57:58
Also in:
linux-nvme, linux-rdma, lkml, netdev
Hi Sagi, On 1/23/2023 1:27 PM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
quoted
From Israel, The purpose of this patchset is to add support for inline encryption/decryption of the data at storage protocols like nvmf over RDMA (at a similar way like integrity is used via unique mkey). This patchset adds support for plaintext keys. The patches were tested on BF-3 HW with fscrypt tool to test this feature, which showed reduce in CPU utilization when comparing at 64k or more IO size. The CPU utilization was improved by more than 50% comparing to the SW only solution at this case. How to configure fscrypt to enable plaintext keys: # mkfs.ext4 -O encrypt /dev/nvme0n1 # mount /dev/nvme0n1 /mnt/crypto -o inlinecrypt # head -c 64 /dev/urandom > /tmp/master_key # fscryptctl add_key /mnt/crypto/ < /tmp/master_key # mkdir /mnt/crypto/test1 # fscryptctl set_policy 152c41b2ea39fa3d90ea06448456e7fb /mnt/crypto/test1 ** “152c41b2ea39fa3d90ea06448456e7fb” is the output of the “fscryptctl add_key” command. # echo foo > /mnt/crypto/test1/foo Notes: - At plaintext mode only, the user set a master key and the fscrypt driver derived from it the DEK and the key identifier. - 152c41b2ea39fa3d90ea06448456e7fb is the derived key identifier - Only on the first IO, nvme-rdma gets a callback to load the derived DEK. There is no special configuration to support crypto at nvme modules.Hey, this looks sane to me in a very first glance. Few high level questions: - what happens with multipathing? when if not all devices are capable. SW fallback?
SW fallback happens every time the device doesn't support the specific crypto request (which include data-unit-size, mode and dun_bytes). So with multipathing, one path uses the HW crypto offload and the other one uses the SW fallback.
- Does the crypt stuff stay intact when bio is requeued?
Yes, the crypto ctx is copied when cloning the bio.
I'm assuming you tested this with multipathing? This is not very useful if it is incompatible with it.
Yes, sure. You can see the call to blk_crypto_reprogram_all_keys(), which is called when the controller was reconnected after port toggling. - Israel