Re: Locking in the clk API
From: Saravana Kannan <hidden>
Date: 2011-01-28 03:29:41
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
From: Saravana Kannan <hidden>
Date: 2011-01-28 03:29:41
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
On 01/27/2011 01:07 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
quoted
quoted
For internal tree purposes, does .set_termios need to be atomic? Can it grab mutexes instead of spinlock?I think I already answered that question above where I said "protect against the interrupt handler accessing the port->* stuff".I'm not sure you answered it correctly however as the locking nowdays is a bit different. Architecturally the termios handling doesn't need a spin lock nor is it called under one. In fact it's vital this is the case because of USB.
Thanks for the clarification Alan. This is what I was looking for. -Saravana -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.