Re: [PATCH 7/8] arm64: dts: s32g2: add memory nodes for evb and rdb2
From: Chester Lin <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-13 14:59:00
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, lkml
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 08:25:00PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
Hi Chester et al., On 05.08.21 08:54, Chester Lin wrote:quoted
Add memory nodes for S32G-VNP-EVB and S32G-VNP-RDB2 since they have fixed RAM size.You can drop "since they have fixed RAM size" - if they didn't, you would simply choose the lowest size and rely on the bootloader (U-Boot) to overwrite it with the actually detected size. Please expand why this patch is separate - BSP based, I assume?
Yes, the information of memory banks is from s32 downstream kernel, which is listed in the board DTs of older releases [bsp27] although newer releases [bsp28 & bsp29] have moved it into s32 downstream u-boot as runtime fdt-fixup. I think we should still reveal this information in kernel DTs in order to have better understanding of system memory ranges that each board can have. @NXP: Please don't hesitate to let me know if any better idea, thanks!
quoted
Signed-off-by: Chester Lin <redacted> --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/s32g274a-evb.dts | 8 ++++++++ arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/s32g274a-rdb2.dts | 8 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/s32g274a-evb.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/s32g274a-evb.dts index a1ae5031730a..cd41f0af5dd8 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/s32g274a-evb.dts +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/s32g274a-evb.dts@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later OR MIT /* * Copyright (c) 2021 SUSE LLC + * Copyright 2019-2020 NXP@NXP: Please review year, alignment. Do any Signed-off-bys apply?quoted
*/ /dts-v1/;@@ -14,6 +15,13 @@ / { chosen { stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8"; }; + + memory@80000000 { + device_type = "memory"; + /* 4GB RAM */This looks strange to me - either put /* 4 GiB RAM */ before the node, three lines above, and/or append comment /* 2 GiB */ on each line below. Note the space, and suggest to be precise about factor 1024 vs. 1000.
Thank you for the suggestion.
quoted
+ reg = <0 0x80000000 0 0x80000000>,Note that this gives you the range to use for the .dtsi /soc node: Address 0x0 with size 0x80000000 gets mapped to 0x0 0x0, excluding the upper 0x80000000 for the RAM here. Or address 0x0 0x0 for two /soc cells if there are high-memory peripherals.
I don't know if memory ranges might be changed for new boards or CPU revisions in the future, which means the first memory range might be expanded as well [e.g. 0~4GB]. Based this assumption, I think the size should also be changed accordingly. Not sure if overlays can still work with this case but overwriting all reg properties under /soc could be awful. However if we only have to think of current hardware spec, it's good to declare "range = <0 0 0 0x80000000>". Please feel free to let me know if any suggestions, thanks.
quoted
+ <8 0x80000000 0 0x80000000>;Maybe use 0x8 here and 0x0 above? (second 0 stays same, so don't mind)
Will fix it.
quoted
+ }; }; &uart0 {diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/s32g274a-rdb2.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/s32g274a-rdb2.dts index b2faae306b70..8fbbf3b45eb8 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/s32g274a-rdb2.dts +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/s32g274a-rdb2.dts@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later OR MIT /* * Copyright (c) 2021 SUSE LLC + * Copyright 2019-2020 NXP@NXP: 2021?quoted
*/ /dts-v1/;@@ -14,6 +15,13 @@ / { chosen { stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8"; }; + + memory@80000000 { + device_type = "memory"; + /* 4GB RAM */ + reg = <0 0x80000000 0 0x80000000>, + <8 0x80000000 0 0x80000000>; + };Same comments as for EVB.quoted
}; &uart0 {Regards, Andreas -- SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg)