Re: [PATCH v4] uart: fix race between uart_put_char() and uart_shutdown()
From: Tycho Andersen <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-12 14:13:22
Also in:
lkml
Hi Andy, On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 12:03:08PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 7:07 PM, Tycho Andersen [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Anyway, since the lock is not acquired, if uart_shutdown() is called, the last chunk of that function may release state->xmit.buf before its assigned to null, and cause the race above. To fix it, let's lock uport->lock when allocating/deallocating state->xmit.buf in addition to the per-port mutex.quoted
* use the result of uart_port_lock() in uart_shutdown() to avoid uninitialized warning * don't use the uart_port_lock/unlock macros in uart_port_startup, instead test against uport directly; the compiler can't seem to "see" through the macros/ref/unref calls to not warn about uninitialized flags. We don't need to do a ref here since we hold the per-port mutex anyway.quoted
+ if (uport) + spin_lock_irqsave(&uport->lock, flags);quoted
+ if (uport) + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&uport->lock, flags);At some point it It was uart_port_lock()/uart_port_unlock(), and you changed to simple spin lock. The macro also take reference to the port. Do we aware about that here?
I don't think so, the commit message you quoted above says,
We don't need to do a ref here since we hold the per-port mutex anyway.
Cheers, Tycho