Thread (27 messages) 27 messages, 4 authors, 2018-07-13

Re: [PATCH v4] uart: fix race between uart_put_char() and uart_shutdown()

From: Tycho Andersen <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-12 14:13:22
Also in: lkml

Hi Andy,

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 12:03:08PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 7:07 PM, Tycho Andersen [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Anyway, since the lock is not acquired, if uart_shutdown() is called, the
last chunk of that function may release state->xmit.buf before its assigned
to null, and cause the race above.

To fix it, let's lock uport->lock when allocating/deallocating
state->xmit.buf in addition to the per-port mutex.
quoted
    * use the result of uart_port_lock() in uart_shutdown() to avoid
      uninitialized warning
    * don't use the uart_port_lock/unlock macros in uart_port_startup,
      instead test against uport directly; the compiler can't seem to "see"
      through the macros/ref/unref calls to not warn about uninitialized
      flags. We don't need to do a ref here since we hold the per-port
      mutex anyway.
quoted
+       if (uport)
+               spin_lock_irqsave(&uport->lock, flags);
quoted
+       if (uport)
+               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&uport->lock, flags);
At some point it It was uart_port_lock()/uart_port_unlock(), and you
changed to simple spin lock. The macro also take reference to the
port. Do we aware about that here?
I don't think so, the commit message you quoted above says,
We don't need to do a ref here since we hold the per-port mutex
anyway.
Cheers,

Tycho
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help