Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 4 authors, 2012-06-19

Re: [RFC PATCH] pch_uart: Add eg20t_port lock field, avoid recursive spinlocks

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2012-06-18 22:21:11
Also in: lkml

On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 02:41:46PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:

On 06/05/2012 04:48 PM, Tomoya MORINAGA wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Darren Hart [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Are there still concerns about the additional lock? I'll resend V2
tomorrow with the single whitespace fix if I don't hear anything back today.
I understand your saying. Looks good.
However, I am not expert of linux-uart core system.
So, I'd like UART maintainer to give us your opinion.
Greg, Alan,

any concerns with the locking approach I've adopted in the patch?
Care to resend the patch, as it was a RFC one, it's no longer in my
queue.

thanks,

greg k-h
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help