Re: [RFC PATCH] pch_uart: Add eg20t_port lock field, avoid recursive spinlocks
From: Tomoya MORINAGA <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-05 23:48:23
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Darren Hart [off-list ref] wrote:
Are there still concerns about the additional lock? I'll resend V2 tomorrow with the single whitespace fix if I don't hear anything back today.
I understand your saying. Looks good. However, I am not expert of linux-uart core system. So, I'd like UART maintainer to give us your opinion. thanks. tomoya