Re: [PATCH] RS485: fix inconsistencies in the meaning of some variables
From: Greg KH <hidden>
Date: 2011-11-08 14:25:14
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
From: Greg KH <hidden>
Date: 2011-11-08 14:25:14
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 01:48:04PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
quoted
The modifications that I have proposed are very minimal, and most user-space code should continue to work without any difference. Any Cris user-space code will continue to work, because we didn't change the behavior of the driver. For Atmel user-space code, instead, the behavior of the driver changes only if flags are not set and delay variables contain a value different than 0 (which, hopefully, is not a very common situation). That's the reason why I preferred to not change the names of the variables, even if better names would be desirable.We have inconsistency between implementations. We don't have a change in implementation. There isn't any way to resolve that except by fixing the deviating implementation and doing it promptly. With my tty hat on I'm quite happy with this patch. The sooner it is upstream the better.
Ok, I'll push to get it to Linus for the next rc release. greg k-h