Thread (26 messages) 26 messages, 11 authors, 2011-11-14

Re: [PATCH] RS485: fix inconsistencies in the meaning of some variables

From: Greg KH <hidden>
Date: 2011-11-08 14:25:14
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, lkml

On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 01:48:04PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
quoted
The modifications that I have proposed are very minimal, and most 
user-space code should continue to work without any difference. Any Cris 
user-space code will continue to work, because we didn't change the 
behavior of the driver. For Atmel user-space code, instead, the behavior 
of the driver changes only if flags are not set and delay variables 
contain a value different than 0 (which, hopefully, is not a very common 
situation). That's the reason why I preferred to not change the names of 
the variables, even if better names would be desirable.
We have inconsistency between implementations. We don't have a change in
implementation. There isn't any way to resolve that except by fixing the
deviating implementation and doing it promptly.

With my tty hat on I'm quite happy with this patch. The sooner it is
upstream the better.
Ok, I'll push to get it to Linus for the next rc release.

greg k-h
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help