Re: [PATCH] landlock: fix grammar and spelling error
From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
Date: 2025-01-24 11:36:25
Also in:
lkml
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 01:12:10AM +0530, Tanya Agarwal wrote:
From: Tanya Agarwal <redacted> Fix grammar and spelling error in landlock module comments that were identified using the codespell tool. No functional changes - documentation only. Signed-off-by: Tanya Agarwal <redacted> Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
I think Mimi's tag was for the IMA part, so I'll remove it.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- Original discussion: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250112072925.1774-1-tanyaagarwal25699@gmail.com (local) This patch set is split into individual patches for each LSM to facilitate easier review by respective maintainers. security/landlock/ruleset.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/security/landlock/ruleset.c b/security/landlock/ruleset.c index a93bdbf52fff..c464d1f84792 100644 --- a/security/landlock/ruleset.c +++ b/security/landlock/ruleset.c@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ create_rule(const struct landlock_id id, return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); RB_CLEAR_NODE(&new_rule->node); if (is_object_pointer(id.type)) { - /* This should be catched by insert_rule(). */ + /* This should have been caught by insert_rule(). */ WARN_ON_ONCE(!id.key.object); landlock_get_object(id.key.object); }
Thanks, I'll take it in my tree.