On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 5:06 PM Mickaël Salaün [off-list ref] wrote:

On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 01:12:10AM +0530, Tanya Agarwal wrote:

quoted

From: Tanya Agarwal <redacted>

Fix grammar and spelling error in landlock module comments that were
identified using the codespell tool.
No functional changes - documentation only.

Signed-off-by: Tanya Agarwal <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

I think Mimi's tag was for the IMA part, so I'll remove it.

quoted

---
Original discussion:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250112072925.1774-1-tanyaagarwal25699@gmail.com (local)

This patch set is split into individual patches for each LSM
to facilitate easier review by respective maintainers.

 security/landlock/ruleset.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/security/landlock/ruleset.c b/security/landlock/ruleset.c
index a93bdbf52fff..c464d1f84792 100644
--- a/security/landlock/ruleset.c
+++ b/security/landlock/ruleset.c

@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ create_rule(const struct landlock_id id,
              return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
      RB_CLEAR_NODE(&new_rule->node);
      if (is_object_pointer(id.type)) {
-             /* This should be catched by insert_rule(). */
+             /* This should have been caught by insert_rule(). */
              WARN_ON_ONCE(!id.key.object);
              landlock_get_object(id.key.object);
      }

Thanks, I'll take it in my tree.

Thanks Mickael.

Regards,
Tanya