Thread (82 messages) 82 messages, 4 authors, 2022-02-24

Re: [PATCH v10 24/27] ima: Introduce securityfs file to activate an IMA namespace

From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Date: 2022-02-23 17:12:46
Also in: linux-integrity, lkml

On Wed, 2022-02-23 at 12:08 -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 2/23/22 08:54, Mimi Zohar wrote:
quoted
On Tue, 2022-02-01 at 15:37 -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
quoted
  int ima_fs_ns_init(struct user_namespace *user_ns, struct dentry *root)
  {
  	struct ima_namespace *ns = ima_ns_from_user_ns(user_ns);
@@ -531,6 +596,12 @@ int ima_fs_ns_init(struct user_namespace *user_ns, struct dentry *root)
  		}
  	}
  
+	if (ns != &init_ima_ns) {
+		ret = ima_fs_add_ns_files(ima_dir);
+		if (ret)
+			goto out;
+	}
+
In all other cases, the securityfs files are directly created in
ima_fs_ns_init().   What is different about "active" that a new
function is defined?

It was meant as a function to create namespace-specific files, if more 
were to come along.  I can move the code from ima_fs_add_ns_files() into 
this function if you want.
Perhaps defer defining a new function until that happens.

thanks,

Mimi
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help