Thread (82 messages) 82 messages, 4 authors, 2022-02-24
STALE1576d
Revisions (10)
  1. v3 [diff vs current]
  2. v4 [diff vs current]
  3. v5 [diff vs current]
  4. v6 [diff vs current]
  5. v10 current
  6. v11 [diff vs current]
  7. v12 [diff vs current]
  8. v13 [diff vs current]
  9. v14 [diff vs current]
  10. v15 [diff vs current]

[PATCH v10 02/27] ima: Do not print policy rule with inactive LSM labels

From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Date: 2022-02-01 20:40:10
Also in: linux-integrity, lkml
Subsystem: extended verification module (evm), integrity measurement architecture (ima), security subsystem, the rest · Maintainers: Mimi Zohar, Roberto Sassu, Dmitry Kasatkin, Paul Moore, James Morris, "Serge E. Hallyn", Linus Torvalds

Before printing a policy rule scan for inactive LSM labels in the policy
rule. Inactive LSM labels are identified by args_p != NULL and
rule == NULL.

Fixes: b16942455193 ("ima: use the lsm policy update notifier")
Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index 320ca80aacab..2a1f6418b10a 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -1967,6 +1967,14 @@ int ima_policy_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 
+	/* Do not print rules with inactive LSM labels */
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) {
+		if (entry->lsm[i].args_p && !entry->lsm[i].rule) {
+			rcu_read_unlock();
+			return 0;
+		}
+	}
+
 	if (entry->action & MEASURE)
 		seq_puts(m, pt(Opt_measure));
 	if (entry->action & DONT_MEASURE)
-- 
2.31.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help