Re: [PATCH v8 03/17] integrity: Introduce a Linux keyring called machine

From
Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
Date
2021-11-29 22:54:38
Also in
keyrings, linux-crypto, linux-efi, linux-integrity, lkml
Reply to
Mimi Zohar, 2021-11-25
On Nov 24, 2021, at 7:49 PM, Mimi Zohar [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, 2021-11-23 at 23:41 -0500, Eric Snowberg wrote:
quoted
+config INTEGRITY_MACHINE_KEYRING
+       bool "Provide a keyring to which CA Machine Owner Keys may be added"
+       depends on SECONDARY_TRUSTED_KEYRING
+       depends on INTEGRITY_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS
Shouldn't this be "ASYMMETRIC_PUBLIC_KEY_SUBTYPE=y"?   With this
change, is  "KEYS: Create static version of
public_key_verify_signature" trusted needed?
I believe it is still needed. If someone were to use the same config as the build bot, 
where ASYMMETRIC_PUBLIC_KEY_SUBTYPE is not defined and 
INTEGRITY_MACHINE_KEYRING is not defined, they would still hit the problem that 
has now been fixed in  "KEYS: Create static version of public_key_verify_signature”. 

I wish the first two patches in this series would be accepted, since I’m only carrying 
them to get past the build bot.
Thread (49 messages) 49 messages, 7 authors, last reply 2022-11-10
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help