Thread (49 messages) 49 messages, 7 authors, 2022-11-10

Re: [PATCH v8 03/17] integrity: Introduce a Linux keyring called machine

From: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
Date: 2021-11-29 22:54:38
Also in: keyrings, linux-efi, linux-integrity, linux-security-module, lkml

On Nov 24, 2021, at 7:49 PM, Mimi Zohar [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, 2021-11-23 at 23:41 -0500, Eric Snowberg wrote:
quoted
+config INTEGRITY_MACHINE_KEYRING
+       bool "Provide a keyring to which CA Machine Owner Keys may be added"
+       depends on SECONDARY_TRUSTED_KEYRING
+       depends on INTEGRITY_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS
Shouldn't this be "ASYMMETRIC_PUBLIC_KEY_SUBTYPE=y"?   With this
change, is  "KEYS: Create static version of
public_key_verify_signature" trusted needed?
I believe it is still needed. If someone were to use the same config as the build bot, 
where ASYMMETRIC_PUBLIC_KEY_SUBTYPE is not defined and 
INTEGRITY_MACHINE_KEYRING is not defined, they would still hit the problem that 
has now been fixed in  "KEYS: Create static version of public_key_verify_signature”. 

I wish the first two patches in this series would be accepted, since I’m only carrying 
them to get past the build bot.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help