Thread (31 messages) 31 messages, 3 authors, 2021-09-09

Re: [PATCH v5 04/12] integrity: restrict INTEGRITY_KEYRING_MACHINE to restrict_link_by_ca

flat view

From: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
Date: 2021-09-09 17:54:05
Also in: keyrings, linux-crypto, linux-integrity, lkml

On Sep 9, 2021, at 11:25 AM, Mimi Zohar [off-list ref] wrote:

On Tue, 2021-09-07 at 12:01 -0400, Eric Snowberg wrote:
quoted
Set the restriction check for INTEGRITY_KEYRING_MACHINE keys to
restrict_link_by_ca.  This will only allow CA keys into the machine
keyring.

Signed-off-by: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
Normally the new function, in this case the restriction, and usage
should be defined together.  Any reason why 3/12 and 4/12 are two
separate patches?  
I split them since they cross subsystems.
I would squash them together.
But I can squash them together in the next round.
quoted
---
v1: Initial version
v2: Added !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEGRITY_TRUSTED_KEYRING check so mok
   keyring gets created even when it isn't enabled
v3: Rename restrict_link_by_system_trusted_or_ca to restrict_link_by_ca
v4: removed unnecessary restriction->check set
v5: Rename to machine keyring
---
security/integrity/digsig.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/integrity/digsig.c b/security/integrity/digsig.c
index 5a75ac2c4dbe..2b75bbbd9e0e 100644
--- a/security/integrity/digsig.c
+++ b/security/integrity/digsig.c
@@ -132,14 +132,18 @@ int __init integrity_init_keyring(const unsigned int id)
		goto out;
	}

-	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEGRITY_TRUSTED_KEYRING))
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEGRITY_TRUSTED_KEYRING) && id != INTEGRITY_KEYRING_MACHINE)
Over 80 chars, please split the line
I thought the 80 char limit was relaxed?  But if it hasn’t
I can change this too.  Thanks.


Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help